The Blythe Sappers
62nd Management Meeting
1030hrs Wednesday
1st June 2011
The Army & Navy Club, London
Those Present:
Sapper Idris Pearce Chairman
Sapper Bill Woodburn Chairman Designate 2012
Sapper Roy Wilsher Honorary
Treasurer
Sapper John Wilks Honorary Auditor
Sapper
Sapper
John McLennan Honorary Secretary
1. Item
1 Introduction. The Chairman
welcomed all those in attendance.
2. Item
2 Apologies for Absence. Apologies
had been received from Colonel Sean Harris Regt Col, Sappers Charles Holman, John
Moore-Bick, Brian Pearce.
3. Item
3 Minutes of the Previous Meeting.
The Minutes of the 61st Meeting of the Blythe Sappers Management
Committee had been published on the BS website for a month. The Minutes of the
previous meeting were signed.
4. Item
4. Matters
Arising. The Chairman raised the following points:
·
Letter on AT&CP
letter -- to be discussed later.
·
Derby Day Draw -- the procedures were
discussed.
5. Item
5. Finance. Sapper Roy Wilsher referred to the revised
Blythe Sappers Budget sheet and is attached at Annex A. Points to note
are:
1. AT&CP. The draft letter had been circulated prior to
the meeting and was approved by the Committee.
The final document was approved by the Committee and is attached at Annex B. It was agreed that BS
Council be informed that the letter had been approved by Management Committee.
2. The Chairman agreed
that the monies due to him as a re-imbursement for payment of two lunches where
his guest could not attend should be credited to the BS accounts.
3. The Committee discussed
a donation to a charity of choice.
·
It
was decided that the sum of £1,000 would be granted to one of the charity’s
chosen by the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge for the royal wedding --
The Army Widows Association --
Charity number 1127921.
·
Forces Children Trust -- it was agreed to give £1,000.
·
Not Forgotten Association -- it was agreed to give £1,000.
Carried
6. Item
6.
7
Item
7. Casualties Since
Last Meeting
Deceased. Sappers Maurice Parrott, Antony Shave
Resigned: Nil
8 Item
8. Nominations for New Members
|
Nomination |
Sponsor |
Seconder |
|
Captain
(Retd) Hamish Bryce |
Sapper Peter Heier |
Sapper
Richard Peck |
|
Major
Hazel Whiteman RE |
Sapper Larry Inge |
Sapper
Colin Walker |
Both Approved
9. Item 9 Attendance
& Arrangements for Today’s Luncheon
Principle Guest: Mr Keith Simpson MP
Total number Attending 85
Number of Guests 17
Those
to Rise 3 (Sappers Iain James, Joe Fossey,
Mungo Melvin)
Derby Draw To take place after the
parish notices
10. Any Other Business
Sat 6th Aug 11 BS Guest Night RE HQ Mess Chatham
Wed
5th Oct 11 Lunch & AGM The Lord Dannatt
Wed
7th Dec 11 Christmas Lunch Baroness Boothroyd
11. Date of Next Meeting. 1100hrs on Wednesday 5th October 2011
under the Chairmanship of Sapper Idris Pearce. This meeting will be
followed by the Blythe Sappers Annual General Meeting after the lunch.
|
|
|
Sapper Idris Pearce
Chairman The Blythe Sappers |
Sapper
John R McLennan Honorary Secretary The Blythe Sappers |
|
Oct
11 |
June
2011 |
Annex A
The Blythe Sappers Proposed Budget 2011
Annex B
AT&CP Letter
BS Management Minutes Jun 11
Blythe Sappers Fund for
Adventurous and Challenging Pursuits
Assessment of Application for
Grants
1. Introduction. The
Fund has been in existence for over eighteen years and more than ninety seven
grants have been made. Some applications have been turned down as not appearing
sufficiently adventurous or challenging in their aims. It is now thought
necessary to prepare simple guidelines on the levels of adventure and challenge
required for an application to be successful. These should enable those
assessing applications to be consistent in their awards; they should also help
applicants to know what to demonstrate to convince those responsible that their
proposed expedition is worthy of the Blythe Sappers support.
2. Flexibility.
No two expeditions or their grant applications are the same. These
guidelines should be interpreted as giving “general indications” of what is
required, rather than hard and fast rules.
3. Eligibility. Grants are made towards the costs of
members of the Royal Engineers, whether commissioned or not and whether serving
in the Regular or Territorial Army or Queens Gurkha Engineers. Expeditions need
not consist exclusively of RE personnel. Sappers participating in an Army,
Joint Service, University or Society expedition are particularly deserving of
financial assistance, where this will benefit the standing of the Corps. Whilst
the Fund is aimed primarily towards younger and more junior soldiers,
assistance to other members of the Corps is not excluded.
4. Location.
Adventure and challenge are most clearly present in remote areas,
particularly where there are also extremes of climate and temperature.
Applications in respect of expeditions to such locations must therefore have stronger
merits than those to more developed and temperate areas. This applies whether
the locations are on land, on sea or even in the air.
5. Accommodation. Expeditions will normally be
expected to be living rough.
6.
Guides. It is sometimes obligatory to employ guides
in national parks and mountain areas; these will not invalidate an application,
but preference will be given to expeditions going on their own into un-trodden
or un-charted territory.
7. Training. Although there are always
opportunities for gaining experience and knowledge from any expedition,
training or the acquisition of qualifications should not be the primary
purpose. In addition, it is unlikely that applications involving attendance at
formal courses, e.g. shallow water diving, would be
successful.
8. Charitable events.
Sponsorship will not be approved for participation in a fund-raising
event for a charity.
9. Value of grants.
The total amount donated from the Fund since 1993 is £31,950. The
balance of the Fund granted to the RECCT as at 31 Dec 10 stood at £4,226.40.
Normally grants whether to individuals or groups are made at the prerogative of
the Regimental Colonel. This is in accordance with the decision made by the
Management Committee at a meeting in 2006; Grants made are normally up to a
maximum of £400/head/expedition according to the individual’s contributions
towards the total cost of the expedition/exercise.
10. Grants. Grants
from the Fund to the RECCT are made annually according to applications and the
amount allocated in the budget.
11. Reports. The BS Management Committee is to be kept
informed of all AT&CP Fund made by the Regimental Colonel and Post Exercise
Reports (P&R) should be copied to The Blythe Sappers for info.
As approved by the Management Committee
1st June 2011
Annex C
Corps Report
BS Management Minutes Mar 11
Regimental Colonel’s
Report on the Corps
HEADLINE ISSUES
|
|
Held Strength |
RAL |
Difference |
% of RAL |
Remarks |
|
Officers |
1,280 |
1,197 |
+83 |
107.0 |
Lt to Lt Col (incl LE) |
|
Soldiers |
8,210 |
8,332 |
-122 |
98.0 |
|
|
TOTAL |
9,490 |
9,529 |
-39 |
0.4 |
|
|
Females |
155 |
|
|
1.6 |
All ranks |
|
Foreign
& Commonwealth |
445 |
|
|
4.7 |
All ranks |
OPERATIONS AND
DEPLOYMENTS
|
Capability |
HERRICK 12 Apr 10 – Oct 10 |
HERRICK 13 Oct 10 – Apr 11 |
RHQ Engr Regt
|
21
Engr Regt |
23
Engr Regt (Air Asslt) |
Infra
|
64
Wks Gp (62 Wks Gp from Jul) |
62
Wks Gp (66 Wks Gp from Dec) |
|
C-IED
TF |
·
RHQ 33 Engr Regt (-) ·
21 Fd Sqn (EOD) ·
Search backfill from 36 Engr Regt, 12 (Air Sp) Engr Gp with res of 23 Pnr Regt RLC ·
Elms 521 EOD Sqn RLC ·
(WIS and ECM Elms |
·
HQ 29 Gp IA HQ ·
61 Fd Sqn (EOD) ·
621 EOD Sqn RLC ·
Search backfill from 23 Engr Regt (Air Asslt), 6 HQ Sqn
(22 Engr Regt), 12 (Air Sp) Engr Gp with 23 Pnr Regt RLC ·
WIS and ECM Elms |
RE CAPABILITY
§
Enhancements
to operational equipment continue to be developed. The successful TALISMAN route proving and clearance system is being upgraded by
the addition of a DETECT and FLAIL system on a remotely operated chassis.
§
C-Vehicle Private Finance
Initiative. A number of replacement fleets including
Medium and Self Loading Dump Trucks as well as well drilling and LWT/MWT will
be fielded in 2011.
§
Boats. The ageing Rigid Raider craft Mk III is
increasingly difficulty to support and will be withdrawn from service in 2011;
the capability will be gapped for several years until a replacement can be
delivered.
§
TROJAN and TITAN (Engineer
Tanks). These vehicles have proven to be
a step change in mobility, protection and obstacle breeching. TROJAN has been used successfully on
operations in Afghanistan and has breached IED belts and forced entry into
compounds.
§
TERRIER (son of CET). The replacement for CET is an urgently
required one. TERRIER offers a
well-protected, rapidly mobile successor and is currently undergoing demanding
trials in the SE England.
§
Tactical Bases. In future, all tactical infrastructure bases
will be delivered as integrated
capability platforms. This will
include combat power, surveillance, generators, protective structures and
living accommodation.
§
Electrical Power. The safe use of
electrical power on operations is challenging but no less necessary. A mechanism for stronger governance has been
established in theatre and all arms courses are being developed.
§
Explosive Ordnance
Disposal. The Land Forces EOD
and Search Branch was established in HQ EinC(A) in
2010 with the aim of providing a single focus for all policy, direction and
inspectorate responsibilities. The team
of 8 was fully operational by Jul 10.
The original intent has been exceeded and the Corps now fields the
one-star Defeat the Device lead for
C-IED search.
§
Geographic Support. Engineer geographic capability continues to
provide Joint Force Engineer Group (in Afghanistan) full support. Work is on-going in the UK to rebase 42
Engineer Regiment (Geo) to RAF Wyton. The Royal School of Military Survey is likely
to move to Chicksands in 2013 thus ending the
long-standing military relationship with Hermitage.
§
RSME Update. The RSME has changed
significantly over the past year with the HOLDFAST contract securely bedded
in. Courses have been redesigned and are
now quicker and more efficient. Whilst
RSME has focused largely on the Afghanistan campaign, it remains committed to
longer term training and being appropriately placed to meet the challenges of
the next campaign wherever that might be.
REGIMENTAL
HEADQUARTERS ROYAL ENGINEERS (CHATHAM)
§ RE Museum, Library & Archive Staff. Essential recruiting to support the funded
projects and a credible return to the Heritage Lottery Fund for £2M has
recommenced following successful recruitment of an MA qualified E-Band.
o
The Fortifications
Gallery. The Museum was successful in its bid for
minor lottery funding (46K) and this coupled with money raised from the ‘Hold
the Fort’ raffle will allow work to begin, in earnest, in the coming months. In
addition, the Museum courtyard’s glazed vault is high enough to fit the Corps’
V2 if reassembled and we await advice from the Science Museum and the RAF
Museum on structural, cosmetic and transport issues.
o
Grounds. The installation of another 30m of high
quality iron fencing funded by the Local Authority for the public perimeter is
imminent. This leaves about 25% of the public perimeter to be addressed by MOD
in future. The Museum will continue to lobby the Local Authority to improve the
facilities and access directly in front of the Museum.
o
Governance. The Historic Dockyard lease has completed and
the first rent has been paid. Work on the CSA awaits final estimates of estate
management costs by REMLA.
CORPS SPORT – No change to the last
Corps Update
S P F HARRIS
Col
Regt Col
Mil: 94661 2034